See Nothing, Hear Nothing, Know Nothing - How much do senior management need to understand of the models being used?
Posted on 29-06-2009 by Craig Turnbull | 0 comments
This can operate on a number of levels:
First, there needs to be an understanding of the questions that the model is trying to answer and their fundamental ramifications for the firm’s business model. For example, if the model is being used to calculate 1-yr VaR based on market-consistent asset and liability values, this might mean that pricing products at a sub-market-consistent-level is suddenly going to start looking untenable. So this needs to be joined up with the way the firm more broadly measures value creation, and there may be a need to recognize that previous practices of, say, managing to GAAP accounting rules may not perform well from a more economically coherent basis.
Second, banks and insurance groups are holding and writing complex products with complex market/credit risk profiles. There has to be some deep technical understanding of these complexities at a very senior level in order to effectively and responsibly manage the business.
Third, senior management don’t need to be quants. But they need to have an awareness of the fundamental limitations of the models that are being employed by the firm in internal, regulatory capital and financial reporting applications. There needs to be an appreciation of what the models leave behind; that financial modeling always has model risk; that calibration is far from an exact science. And that these limitations may create perverse incentives for their people that may conflict with what’s in the long-term interests of the firm .
Please read our participation policy before submitting a comment.